nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2019, 06, v.46;No.199 45-51
乡村振兴进程中文化治理绩效差距的实证研究——基于全国60个村庄的调查数据
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金项目(13CZZ043);; 山东省妇联专项课题(SDY201838)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2019.06.007
发布时间: 2019-11-28
出版时间: 2019-11-28
网络发布时间: 2019-11-28
移动端阅读
摘要:

农村文化是村民文化价值观和生产方式、生活惯习与交往法则的有机统一。文化治理不仅是国家治理的首要组成,而且也是衡量乡村振兴进程的重要标准。本文从村庄文化传播媒介、基础设施投入、文化活动次数三个层面检视文化治理的绩效水平。60个村庄的调查数据表明,目前农村公共文化传播媒介样态多样但增量有限,传统与现代公共文化传播媒介普及率差异化明显,有线电视开始覆盖村庄,村庄入户使用率较低。宽带互联网开始进入村庄,村庄农户使用率也偏低;文化体育等设施公共投入总量偏少且分布不均,城郊村文化设施投入要比农村地区多,务工农户多的村庄文化设施投入较多;村庄公益文化活动次数不多且有较大的差异,村庄财力与文化活动次数呈正比,城郊村文化活动次数多于农村地区村庄,中部地区举行公益文化活动次数多于东西部地区。因此要对农村文化产品进行投入,合理布局文化设施,凸显文化公共性的建设平台。

Abstract:

Rural culture is the organic unity of villagers' cultural values, production methods, life habits and communication rules. Cultural governance is not only the primary component of national governance, but also an important standard to measure the process of Rural Revitalization. This paper examines the performance level of cultural governance from three aspects: Village cultural media, infrastructure investment and cultural activities. According to the survey data of 60 villages, at present, the rural public culture media are diverse but limited in increment, and the penetration rate of traditional and modern public culture media is significantly different. Cable TV begins to cover villages, and the use rate of villages to households is relatively low. Broadband Internet began to enter the village, and the utilization rate of rural households was also low; the total amount of public investment in cultural and sports facilities was small and uneven, and the investment in cultural facilities in suburban villages was more than that in rural areas, and the investment in cultural facilities in rural areas was more than that of migrant farmers; the number of public cultural activities in villages was small and there was a big difference, and the financial resources of villages were in direct proportion to the number of cultural activities, suburban villages The number of cultural activities is more than that of villages in rural areas, and the number of public cultural activities in the central region is more than that in the eastern and western regions. Therefore, we should invest in rural cultural products, reasonably arrange cultural facilities, and highlight the construction platform of cultural publicity.

参考文献

(1)蔡利民:《文化兴国运兴,文化强民族强》,http://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2018-06/07/nw.D110000gmrb_20180607_1-02.htm.

(2)施雪华,禄琼:《当前中国文化治理的意义、进程与思路》 ,《学术界》,2017年第1期。

(3)颜玉凡:《政府视野下公共文化治理的三重使命》,《浙江社会科学》,2016年第3期。

(4)《中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第四次全体会议在北京举行》,http://news.cnr.cn/native/gd/20191031/t20191031_524840428.shtml.

(5)刘展,姚君喜:《“媒介场域”:乡村传播媒介的分析视域:以东北 J 村为例》,《西南民族大学学报》(人文社科版),2006年第1期。

(6)严火其,刘畅:《乡村文化振兴:基层软治理与公共性建构的契合逻辑》,《河南师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版) 2019年第2期。

(7)赵高辉:《行动者网络视域下传统媒介组织的融合发展:兼论传统媒介组织的引导力、公信力建设》,《当代传播》,2018年第5期。

(8)王慧娟:《农民文化主体意识与农村文化建设基点》,《甘肃社会科学》,2017年第6期。

(9)颜玉凡,叶南客:《文化治理视域下的公共文化服务:基于政府的行动逻辑》,《开放时代》,2016年第2期。

基本信息:

DOI:10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2019.06.007

中图分类号:G249.2;F320

引用信息:

[1]马学军.乡村振兴进程中文化治理绩效差距的实证研究——基于全国60个村庄的调查数据[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,46(06):45-51.DOI:10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2019.06.007.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金项目(13CZZ043);; 山东省妇联专项课题(SDY201838)

发布时间:

2019-11-28

出版时间:

2019-11-28

网络发布时间:

2019-11-28

检 索 高级检索