| 1,375 | 38 | 54 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
政商关系是政治关系、经济因素、社会活动叠加而成的产物,同时也受到时代背景、制度环境的影响。传统时期政商活动的依附关系根植于中国从传统到近代的政商活动。高度计划经济体制下的政商庇护关系将商业活动简化为具体的指令,从而出现以政代企,政企不分的狭隘行政隶属关系。政商关系异化对营商环境的负面效应主要体现在营商规则的失范、营商活力的衰减、营商主体的抽离等三个层面。"放管服"改革与政商活动形成联动的纽带关系,健康和谐的政商关系可以推进"放管服"改革走向纵深发展,使市场在资源配置中发挥决定性作用,有利于彰显政府服务性职能的实现。因此,要通过厘清政商边界、规范政商交往秩序等手段重塑政商关系,实现营商环境的优化。
Abstract:the relationship between politics and commerce is the product of the superposition of political relations, economic factors and social activities, which is influenced by the background of the times and the institutional environment. The dependence of political and commercial activities in the traditional period is rooted in the political and commercial relations from the traditional to the modern times in China. Under the highly planned economy system, the relationship between the government and the business has simplified the business activities into specific instructions, which leads to the narrow administrative subordination relationship between the government and the business. The negative effects of the dissimilation of the relationship between government and business on the business environment are mainly reflected in three aspects: the anomie of business rules, the decline of business vitality, and the separation of business subjects. The reform of "deregulation service" forms a linkage relationship with political and commercial activities. A healthy and harmonious political and commercial relationship can promote the reform of "deregulation service" to develop in depth, make the market play a decisive role in resource allocation, and be conducive to the realization of the government's service functions. We should reshape the relationship between government and business by clarifying the boundary between government and business, standardizing the order of communication between government and business, so as to optimize the business environment.
(1)宋林霖,何成祥:《优化营商环境视阈下放管服改革的逻辑与推进路径:基于世界银行营商环境指标体系的分析》,《中国行政管理》,2018年第4期。
(2)江炎骏,许德友:《新型政商关系能够引导民营企业履行社会责任吗:基于中国城市政商关系排行榜的实证研究》,《哈尔滨商业大学学报》(社会科学版),2020年第1期。
(3)林雄:《商会经济新探》,广东人民出版社,2016年,第4页。
(4)费正清:《美国与中国》,世界知识出版社,2000年,第17页。
(5)邓小平:《经济工作是当前最大的政治,经济问题是压倒一切的政治问题》,http://cpc.people.com.cn/n/2013/0819/c69710-22616488.html.
(6)耿曙,刘红芹:《改革开放以来中国政商关系的演变》,《山东大学学报》(哲学社会科学版),2018年第6期。
(7)费孝通:《乡土中国》,北京大学出版社,1998年,第16页。
(8)周黎安:《行政发包制》,《社会》,2014年第6期。
(9)聂辉华,张雨潇:《分权、集权与政企合谋》,《世界经济》,2015年第6期。
(10)Doing Business.https://chinese.doingbusiness.org/zh/doingbusiness.
(11)张慧一,杜磊:《创新驱动、政府作用与民营经济发展:基于全国30个省市数据的门限效应分析》,《河南师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版),2019年第4期,第39-45页。
(12)蔡庆丰,田霖,郭俊峰:《民营企业家的影响力与企业的异地并购:基于中小板企业实际控制人政治关联层级的实证发现》,《中国工业经济》,2017年第30期,第156-173页。
(13)赵鼎新:《社会与政治运动讲义》,社会科学文献出版社,2006年,第77页。
(14)李克强:《该放给市场的放足放到位,该政府管的管好管到位》,http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-09/14/content_5322031.htm.
(15)《李克强在全国深化“放管服”改革优化营商环境电视电话会议上的讲话》,http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2019-07/28/content_5416035.htm.
(16)《中国城市政商关系排行榜(2017)》,http://nads.ruc.edu.cn/displaynews.php?id=5559.
(17)陈玮,耿曙:《政府介入与发展阶段:发展策略的新制度分析》,《政治学研究》,2017年第6期。
(18)《“新型政商关系”研究报告发布》,北京大学国家发展研究院,http://www.nsd.pku.edu.cn/cbw/yjbgxl/250860.htm.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2020.03.007
中图分类号:D630;F279.2
引用信息:
[1]毕思斌,张劲松.论政商关系互动的演变过程与路径重塑——兼评“放管服”改革对政商关系的影响[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,47(03):41-46.DOI:10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2020.03.007.
基金信息:
国家社科基金重点项目(15AGL019)
2020-06-10
2020-06-10
2020-06-10