| 1,063 | 8 | 391 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在激烈的政治与军事斗争过程中,"妖魔化"对手是一种非常突出的社会现象。刘邦楚汉战争中两次采取"妖魔化"项羽的行动,刘邦"妖魔化"项羽为其获得道义优势,利于击败竞争对手项羽。汉代史官司马迁与班固"妖魔化"项羽,目的是为刘氏政权合法化提供法理依据。从项羽坑杀秦降军"二十余万",到"火烧阿房宫",再到"弑杀义帝",无不一一反映了这一现象。班固"妖魔化"项羽的笔法比司马迁走得更远。项羽形象和行为经过汉代官方史家精心"妖魔化",已经真伪参半。汉代史书中项羽形象的书写与评价,是胜者意识支配历史人物评价标准的结果。
Abstract：To demonize the opponent is a very prominent social phenomenon in the fierce politic and military struggle.Liubang had two times of behaviors of demonizing Xiangyu in the warfare of Chu and Han,and Liubang had get the moral superiority in order to beat the competition.The Han Dynasty's historian SiMa-qian and Bangu demonized Xiangyu was designed for Liu's regime legalization legal basis.All of them reflected the phenomenon from pitting and killing Qin army's surrenders about 200000to destroying E-Pang-Gong by fire and murdering of the Emperor Yidi.Bangu go more farther for SiMa-qian in the style of demonizing Xiangyu.Xiangyu's image elaboratally demonized by the Han Dynasty's historian was the authenticity of mixed.The image of Xiangyu and evaluating was the result of winner's consciousness controlling the standard evaluating historical figures.
[1]约翰.柯林斯.大战略[M].北京:战士出版社,1978:113.
[2]杨丙安.十一家注孙子校理[M].北京:中华书局,1999:177.
[3]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
[4]班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
[5]王夫之.读通鉴论[M].北京:中华书局,2002:11.
[6]冯东礼.何博士备论注译[M].北京:解放军出版社,1990:21.
[7]张山.项羽坑秦军20余万质疑[J].社会科学辑刊,1989(1).
[8]李振宏.项羽“击坑秦卒二十余万人”献疑[J].湖南行政学院学报,2010(6).
[9]杜牧.樊川文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978:2.
[10]刘庆柱.秦阿房宫遗址的考古发现与研究———兼谈历史资料的科学性与真实性[J].徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(2).
[11]黄伟.项羽没有焚烧阿房宫[J].中国地名,2003(6).
[12]周振甫.诗经译注[M].北京:中华书局,2002:536.
[13]杜预.春秋左传集解[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1977:1431.
[14]顾颉刚.纣恶七十事发生的次第[M]//古史辨:第2册.上海:上海古籍出版社,1982:82-93.
[15]阎盛国.秦汉招降战略战术研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2010:148.
[16]刘文典.淮南鸿烈集解[M].北京:中华书局,1989:340.
基本信息:
DOI：10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2013.04.017
中图分类号:B933;K233
引用信息:
[1]阎盛国.项羽被“妖魔化”的历史学考察[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,40(04):86-90.DOI:10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2013.04.017.
2013-07-10
2013-07-10