河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

教材建设国家事权包括立法权，数字教材立法是人工智能教育立法领域的重要“单行法”,但以何种模式进行数字教材立法具有一定的模糊性。促进型立法模式成为数字教材立法的优选路径。促进型立法在立法目的、功能定位、规范结构和法律责任方面有别于传统管制立法，能较好地满足数字教材立法促进发展与规制风险双重目的。在内在逻辑上，数字教材立法主要是以落实教材建设国家事权为导向，立足数智时代教育发展的知识赋能逻辑，把握数字教材形态的制度风险，整体推进智能时代教育育人目标的实现。实践中，立法的分散性、技术不确定性、知识专业性与民众多元性特征，导致数字教材立法推进存在困境。可借助教育法典编纂契机，推进人工智能教育立法下数字教材立法的体系化，重点明确数字技术在教材领域的四类制度风险，着力规范基础性数字智慧教育平台建设，形成数字教材治理的协同机制等，推进数字教材立法的进程与实施。

The national authority over textbook development includes legislative power. Legislation on digital textbooks serves as an important “special law” under AI-in-education legislation. However, there is a degree of ambiguity regarding the appropriate legislative model for digital textbooks. The promotion-oriented(or facilitative) legislative model has emerged as the preferred path. This type of legislation differs from traditional regulatory legislation in terms of legislative purpose, functional positioning, normative structure, and legal liability. It is better suited to meet the dual objectives of digital textbook legislation: promoting development while managing risks. In terms of its internal logic, such legislation is primarily oriented towards implementing the national authority over textbook development. It is grounded in the logic of knowledge empowerment for educational development in the digital-intelligent era, addresses the institutional risks associated with the form of digital textbooks, and holistically advances the achievement of educational and pedagogical goals in the age of AI. In practice, challenges arise due to the fragmented nature of existing laws, technological uncertainties, specialized knowledge requirements, and diverse public expectations. Leveraging the opportunity presented by the codification of the Education Code, we can promote the systematization of digital textbook legislation under the broader framework of AI-in-education legislation. Key efforts should focus on clarifying four categories of institutional risks posed by digital technologies in the textbook domain, regulating foundational digital smart education platforms, and establishing collaborative mechanisms for digital textbook governance, thereby advancing the process and implementation of such legislation.