nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2012, 02, v.39;No.153 169-173
从宪制运作的角度分析美国内战的发生
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2012.02.021
摘要:

美国南北经济基础的差异决定了内战不可避免是学界主流的观点。长久以来,从美国宪制运作的角度来分析内战的发生被人忽视,事实上,制度性原因的探寻亦具相当意义。19世纪上半期,美国政治体制上出现了诸如权力配置方面的挑战,同时奴隶制议题处于美国宪政转型的中心,而立法、司法和行政各个分支在19世纪上半期的表现都应对内战的爆发有一定检讨之处。

Abstract:

Seemingly the difference between the modes of production of the South and North could decide that the American Civil War would be inevitable.However analysis on the antebellum constitutional operation,which should be very meaningful,has long been ignored.In the first half of the 19th century many challenges had been shaking the American constitutionalism structure,in which slavery issue was in the Centre on the Constitutional transformation.But the issue alone could not be the only and inevitable cause of the Civil War.All the branches of the government,Legislative,Judicial and Administrative,should be to blame for that War.

参考文献

[1]亚历山大.汉密尔顿,詹姆斯.麦迪逊,约翰.杰伊.联邦论[M].尹宣,译.南京:译林出版社,2010.

[2]王希.原则与妥协——美国宪法的精神与实践(修订本).北京大学出版社,2005:203.

[3]Charles W Ramsdell.The Natural Limits of Slavery Expansion[J].The Mississippi Valley Historical Review,1929(2).

[4]Daniel Webster.A memorial of Daniel Webster[M].Boston:Little Brown and Company,1853:116-117.

[5]Edward S.Corwin.Court over Constitution[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1938:7.

[6]Abraham Lincoln.Political debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A.Douglas in the celebrated campaign of 1858[M].Cleveland:OS Hubbell&Company,1895:36-59.

[7]James Buchanan.Mr.Buchanan’s Administration on the Eve of the Rebellion[M].New York:D.Appleton and Company,1866:64.

[8]Michael Holt.The Political Crisis of the 1850s[M].New York:W.W.Norton Company,1983:184.

[9]Leroy P.Graf,Ralph W.Haskins,eds.The Papers of Andrew Johnson,Volume 4,1860-1861[M].Knoxville:Universityof Tennessee Press,1976.

[10]Philip Auchimpaugh.James Buchanan,the Court and the Dred Scott Case[J].Tennessee Historical Magazine,1926:(11).

[11]Phillip Paludan.Taney,Lincoln And The Constitutional Conversation[M].Washington DC:Supreme Court Historical Soci-ety,1996:22.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2012.02.021

中图分类号:K712.43

引用信息:

[1]周杰.从宪制运作的角度分析美国内战的发生[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,39(02):169-173.DOI:10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2012.02.021.

发布时间:

2012-03-10

出版时间:

2012-03-10

检 索 高级检索