调和中的强制——论欧共体法中的一致解释原则A Hard Core in a Mild Way——Consistent Interpretation in the EC Law
杨永红;
摘要(Abstract)：
作为一个有别于普遍国际法的法律秩序,欧共体法建立了不同于普遍国际法的许多规则,一致解释原则当属其中之一。欧洲法院建立和发展一致解释规则旨在保证欧共体法的效力,在确立欧共体法优先地位的基础上,保持了该规则调和的性质,同时试图通过温和而间接的方式使欧共体法在成员国法律制度内取得类似直接效力原则所获得的效力,其内在的强制性随之凸显。与具有直接效力的欧共体法相比,它更易于被各成员国接受,因此与直接效力原则、国家赔偿原则一起成为欧共体法效力的保证。而新近通过Pupino案将该规则扩展适用至欧盟法的第三支柱①,对于欧盟法的发展意味深远。
关键词(KeyWords)： 一致解释原则;直接适用;转化;禁止反言规则;法律确定性原则;对立解释
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Authors): 杨永红;
DOI: 10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2007.03.026
参考文献(References)：
- [1]孔祥俊.WTO法律的国内适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2002.
- [2]Jo Shaw,Lawof the European Union(3rd)[M].Palgrave Mac Millan,2000.
- [3]T.Burgenthal,“Self-excuting and Non-self-excuting treaties in National and international law”[M].Recueil des Cours1992-IV.
- [4]Steinhardt,“the Role of International lawas a Canon of Domestic Statutory Construction”[M].VandLRev1103,1990,43.
- [5]Gerrit Betlem and Andre Nolkaemper,Giving effect to public international law and European law before domesticCourts———Acomparative analysis of the practice of consistent interpretation[M].14(3)EJIL(2003).
- [6]Paul Cragic,Grainne de Burca,EU Law Text,Cases,and Materials[M].Oxford University Press,2003.
- [7]Karen Knop,Here and There:International Lawin Domestic Courts[J].V.32(2000),New York University,Journal of In-ternational law&Politics.
- [8]A.O’Neill,Presentation at Conference‘Enforcing Communitylawbefore national courts ten years of Francovich’[M].Tri-er,Academy of European Law,14 May 2001.
- [9]Maria Fletcher,Extending“indirect effect”to the third pillar:the significance of Pupino[M].(2005)30 E.L.Rev.Dec.Sweet&Maxwell and Contributions 2005.
- [10]A.Nollkaemper,“The Direct Effect of Public International Law”[M].in:J.M.Prinssen&Aschrauwen(ed.),DirectEffect;Rethinking A Classic of EC Legal Doctrine,Groningen,European Law Publishing 2002.