马德普;于保军;

• 1:天津师范大学政治与行政学院

摘要(Abstract)：

政党回应是政党政治的一个重要内容,也是代议民主的内在要求和实现机制。它的核心是政党政策符合公众意见的程度,其主要议题涉及为何回应、何谓回应、如何回应及以及是否回应等问题。这些议题不仅揭示了政党回应的方式,即政党的竞选纲领或政策,而且也引发了对政党类型与政党回应影响因素的考察。学者们不仅区分了主流政党与利基政党的不同回应特点,而且揭示了经济全球化、选举制度和层次、政策或议题的显著性和重要性、媒体、选民群体等影响因素在政党回应过程中的作用。政党回应研究有利于探究政党的行为逻辑,衡量政党在推进民主与治理方面的效能,为竞争体制与非竞争体制国家的政党治理提供一个比较的维度,进而有助于加深对不同政治体制的认识和理解。

关键词(KeyWords)： 政党回应;政党纲领;政策立场;优先事项

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 马德普;于保军;

Email:

DOI: 10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2020.01.004

参考文献(References)：

• (1)Andrew Roberts and Byung-Yeon Kim.Policy Responsiveness in Post-communist Europe:Public Preferences and Economic Reforms,British Journal of Political Science,Vol.41,No.4,2011,pp.819.
• (2)Warren E.Miller and Donald E.Stokes.Constituency Influence in Congress,American Political Science Review,Vol.57(March),1963,pp.45-56.
• (3)Robert Dahl.A preface to democratic theory.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1956.
• (4)Robert Dahl.Polyarchy:Participation and Opposition.New Haven and London:Yale University Press,1971,p.1.
• (5)John D.May.Defining Democracy,Political Studies,Vol.26,No.1,1978,pp.1-14.
• (6)Michael Saward.The Terms of Democracy.Oxford:Blackwell Publisher,1998,pp.51.
• (7)Grace Hall Saltzstein.Bureaucratic Responsiveness:Conceptual Issues and Current Research,Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,Vol.2,No.1,1992,pp.65-68.
• (8)Larry Diamond and Leonardo Morlino.An Overview of The Quality of Democracy,Journal of Democracy,Vol.15,No.3,2004,pp.20-30.
• (9)Giovanni Sartori.Parties and Party Systems.New York:Cambridge University Press.1976,p.27.
• (10)拉里·戴蒙德,理查德·冈瑟:《政党与民主》,徐琳译,上海人民出版社,2017年,第356页。
• (11)Warren E.Miller and Donald E.Stokes.Constituency Influence in Congress,American Political Science Review,Vol.57(March),1963,pp.45-56.
• (12)Donald E.Stokes.Spatial Model of Party Competition,The American Political Science Review,Vol.57,No.2,1963,p.370.
• (13)Ian Budge.A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition:Uncertainty,Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally,British Journal of Political Science,Vol.24,No.4,1994,pp.443-467.
• (14)James A.Stimson,Michael B.Mackuen and Robert S.Erikson.Dynamic Representation,American Political Science Review,Vol.89,No.3,1995,p.543.
• (15)安东尼·唐斯:《民主的经济理论》,姚洋等译,上海人民出版社,2005年,第22页。
• (16)William H.Riker.The Theory of Political Coalitions.New Haven:Yale University Press.1962.
• (17)Abram De Swaan.Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation.Amsterdam:Elsevier.1973.
• (18)Kaare Strom.A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties,American Journal of Political Science,Vol.34,No.2,1990,pp.565-598.
• (19)Paul D.Schumaker and Russell W.Getter.Policy Responsiveness Bias in 51 American Communities,American Journal of Politics Science,Vol.21,No.2,1977,p.248.
• (20)Sara Binzer Hobolt and Robert Klemmemsen.Responsive Government?Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark,Political Studies,Vol.53,2005,p.382.
• (21)Christopher Wlezien.The Public as Thermostat:Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.American Journal of Political Science,Vol.39,No.4,1995,pp.981-1000.
• (22)Lawrence Ezrow,Catherine De Vries,Marco Steenbergen and Erica Edwards.Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation:Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?Party Politics,Vol.17,No.3,2010,pp.275-301.
• (23)Heike Kluver and Jae-Jae Spoon.Who Responds?Voters,Parties and Issue Attention.British Journal of Political Science,Vol.46,2014,pp.633-654.
• (24)Bryan D.Jones and Frank R.Baumgartner.Representation and Agenda Setting.The Policy Studies Journal,Vol.32,No.1,2004,p.10.
• (25)西摩·马丁·李普塞特:《政治人:政治的社会基础》,郭为桂,林娜译,江苏人民出版社,2013年,第198页。
• (26)James Adams,Andrea B.Haupt and Heather Stoll.What Moves Parties?The Role of Public Opinion and Global Economic Conditions in Western Europe,Comparative Political Studies,Vol.42,No.5,2009,pp.611-639.
• (27)James Adams,Andrea B.Haupt and Heather Stoll.What Moves Parties?The Role of Public Opinion and Global Economic Conditions in Western Europe,Comparative Political Studies,Vol.42,No.5,2009,p.615.
• (28)Adam Przeworski and John Sprague.Paper stones:A history of electoral socialism.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1986.
• (29)亓光:《当代西方转型正义话语批判》,《马克思主义与现实》,2018年第3期。
• (30)Bonnie M.Meguid.Competition Between Unequals:The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success,American Political Science Review,Vol.99,No.3,2005,pp.347-358.
• (31)Thomas M.Meyer and Markus Wagner.Mainstream or Niche?Vote-Seeking Incentives and the Programmatic Strategies of Political Parties,Comparative Political Studies,Vol.46,No.10,2013,pp.1246-1272.
• (32)James Adams,Michael Clark,Lawrence Ezrow and Garrett Glasgow.Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties?The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts,1976–1998,American Journal of Political Science,Vol.50,No.3,2006,pp.513–529.
• (33)Markus Wagner and Thomas M.Meyer.Which Issues do Parties Emphasize?Salience Strategies and Party Organization in Multiparty Systems.West European Politics,Vol.37,No.5,2014,p.1023.
• (34)Lawrence Ezrow and Timothy Hellwig.Responding to Voters or Responding to Markets?Political Parties and Public Opinion in an Era of Globalization,International Studies Quarterly,Vol.58,2014,pp.816–827.
• (35)Andrea Pritoni.Responsive government?Public opinion priorities and government legislation in Belgium,Italy,Spain and the UK (2003-2013):A QCA analysis,XXX SISP Annual Conference,University of Milan (Italy),2016,p.6.
• (36)罗伯特·E.戈定编:《牛津政治行为研究手册(下)》,王浦劬主译,人民出版社,2018年,第780页。
• (37)阿伦·利普哈特:《民主的模式》,陈崎译,北京大学出版社,2006年。
• (38)G.Binham Powell.Election as Instruments of Democracy:Majoritarian and Proportional Views.New Haven:Yale University Press,2000.
• (39)Ronald Rogowski and Mark Andreas Kayser.Majoritarian Electoral Systems and Consumer Power:Price-Level Evidence from the OECD Countries,American Journal of Political Science,Vol.46,No.3,2002,pp.526-539.
• (40)Jay K.Dow.A comparative spatial analysis of majoritarian and proportional elections,Electoral Studies,Vol.20,No.1,2001,pp.109-125.
• (41)Jae-Jae Spoon and Heike Kluver.Do parties respond?How electoral context influences party responsiveness,Electoral Studies,Vol.35,2014,pp.48–60.
• (42)Maxwell Mccombs.Setting the Agenda:The Mass Media and Public Opinion,Cambridge:Polity Press,2004.
• (43)Thomas Nelson,Zoe Oxley and Rosalee Clawson.“Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects”,Political Behavior,Vol.19,No.3,1997,pp.221-246.
• (44)Robert Entman.“Framing:Toward Clarification of A Fractured Paradigm”,Journal of Communication,Vol.43,No.4,1993,pp.51-58.
• (45)Dennis Chong and James Druckman.“Framing Theory”,Annual Review of Political Science,Vol.10,2007,637-655.
• (46)Paul D.Schumaker and Russell W.Getter.Responsiveness Bias in 51 American Communities,American Journal of Political Science,Vol.21,No.2,1977,p.247.
• (47)Kim Quaile Hill and Patricia A.Hurley.Dyadic Representation Reappraised,American Journal of Political Science,Vol.43,No.1,1999,pp.109-137.
• (48)G.Bingham Powell.The Chain of Responsiveness,Journal of Democracy,Vol.15,No.4,2004,pp.91-104.